
About Me
Hey! My name's Ujjwala Singh and I'm a 19 year old Law student at Kings College London! This page is where I pen down my thoughts & feelings about art, architecture and literature in articles, alongside some of my poetry! I also upload Notion templates, Wallpapers & other organizational goodies:) I hope you love it!
Wallpaper
PHONE




the
Overton
Window
The range of policies deemed acceptable by society in public discourse is forever shifting. When making this decision, it is often taken into consideration whether the
policies at hand have a quality of propriety. Policies that could have hitherto been seen by society as ridiculous, bizarre or farcical can, over time, morph to be seen as commonplace, rational and acceptable. To explain this range of ‘acceptable’ policies, Joseph P. Overton introduced the concept of the Overton Window in the mid-1990s.
What began as a simple term to explain (to his potential donors) the purpose of a think tank, turned into a concept that would be used in political discourse for decades to come. Overton, with the help of a brochure and a cardboard slider, presented all the possible policies that could surround a particular issue (in this case education) from least to most government intervention. On one end was the policy of zero public investment in education, i.e., investment from the State. On the other end was the policy of compulsory indoctrination in government schools, i.e. The pupils that attended government schools had no choice in the ideas, morals, beliefs, etc. that they would subscribe to.
On these extremes were policies that Overton stated wouldn’t be viable in any scenario. However, in between these extremes was a range of policies that had considerable viability and could be termed acceptable. This range of policies is what we now know as the Overton Window. In other words, the Overton Window represents political possibility. Not everyone agrees on the ideas inside this window, but it is okay to infer that the ideas that lie within it relate to some level of normalcy.
As all fluctuant concepts, the Overton Windows’ shift depends upon the progression of ideas as time barrels forwards. When politicians deliberate on policy formulation, they understand that those policies can’t be created on the basis of personal whims and fancies, no matter how strong their personal beliefs are. They must hold some form of acceptance by the society at large. The factors that shift the Overton Window include cultural change, political action, moral standings, advocacy, etc. Of course, all of these factors take time to become impactful enough to change the mindsets of the general public. There can therefore be a lag between the time a particular change occurs in society and when policy or legislation reflects this change.
One example of how these shifts work can be found in the women’s vote. After various protests and measures, it became more acceptable to give women the right to vote. The Overton Window’s range changed parallel to this progression. Other examples of changes that shifted the Overton window are the abolition of slavery, expansion of moral circles in relation to animal welfare, advocacy for gay marriage, etc. Proof that the Overton windows’ shift has a direct impact on how society functions and the policies that run it can be seen in the growing support for same sex marriage in the US. A concept that once wasn’t near even the extremities of the Overton window, now dwells within its safe spaces and has also obtained legal backing.
The changes in the range of socially acceptable ideas show that the Overton window was an important concept long before it was termed, and continues to show us how our ideals, values, decisions and mindsets develop and advance over time. In conclusion, the Overton window does not dictate what is good or bad, or even give us the slightest idea of what should or should not constitute acceptable policies. Instead, it only serves to make the mindsets of the general public more transparent and dictate the types of policies that can be put out into the hands of the public while having some magnitude of viability. It shows the policies that the public are currently willing to accept/consider, and helps politicians with policy formulation.
Ujjwala Singh


